text links Leadership Training Link International Leadership for Women Link
 



International Partners

 Swiss Peace Link to CIIAN International Partner Organization Swiss Peace

 

PROJECTS

The International Peace and Prosperity Project (IPPP) in Guinea-Bissau

The Dialogues Project: Bridging People and Identities

Global Warning & Response Network

The Peace Guerilla Handbook

Violence Prevention Blog

Bridge the Knowledge-Action Gap! The Authoritative Statement on How to Reduce Political Violence

Terrorism: Does Conflict Resolution Have a Role?




The International Peace and Prosperity Project (IPPP) - Guinea-Bissau



The IPPP is a political violence prevention project testing the application of lessons learned and best practices to develop a model for fragile, failing and failed states. The IPPP approach to violence prevention features early, holistic, vertically and horizontally integrated activities, by mobilizing and supporting local leadership.

Guinea-Bissau, located in West Africa, is the site of the demonstration case, having been selected from a list of 30 candidate countries based on the work of  Dr. David Carment and colleagues at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA), Carleton University, Ottawa. 

The mission of the IPPP - Guinea Bissau is to prevent violence by working towards peace and prosperity using a rigorous conflict analysis of specific conditions and capacities on the ground; by playing a value-added, catalytic role in assisting Guinea-Bissau citizens and international actors to implement concrete and synergistic actions through dialogue and focused actions; by providing a small grants program to stimulate security and development initiatives; and by undertaking  global advocacy to mobilize international resources.


To achieve its mission in Guinea-Bissau, the IPPP has three phases: 
  • Phase I (October 2004 – July 2005) Crisis Management/Stabilization;
  • Phase  II (August 2005 – September 2006) Action Planning and Implementation; and
  • Phase III (October 2006 – Ongoing) Follow-up and Support.
IPPP Team Meet General Tagme
 "The IPPP Meet With General Tagme Na Wai, Guinea-Bissau  Armed Forces Chief of Staff"  
                                                                                                                                                                   
PHASE I

Phase I of the IPPP activities in Guinea-Bissau concentrated on crisis management/stabilization related to the assassination of the Head of the Armed Forces and potential violence that could have occurred in a volatile presidential election in July 2005. We commissioned an evaluation report from the West African Network for Peacebuilding (WANEP) to document the results of our work. Initial observations indicate that the IPPP and the various activities that it initiated with the Armed Forces, Civil Society, and international actors played an important role in the peaceful transition of power through the election.
 

PHASE II

Phase II of the intervention started with the facilitation of a multi-issue, multi-stakeholder action planning session in Bissau. The session was held to produce a "National Plan of Action for Peace and Prosperity in Guinea-Bissau".

From February 15 to 19, twenty senior representatives from key sectors in Guinea-Bissau participated in a dynamic, creative, and thoughtful meeting to develop a National Action Plan for Peace and Prosperity in Guinea-Bissau. The National Action Planning Session was facilitated by a six-person team of experts, including Mr. Jeff Mapendere of The Carter Center, funded by the International Peace and Prosperity Project. The Session was held under the auspices of a Process Design Committee drawn from Bissau.

The event was very successful. The participants developed a National Action Plan that identifies specific actions that can be taken immediately and be completed soon, or that begin over the next 18 months to address some of the key issues that will advance the development of peace and prosperity in Guinea-Bissau. 

The IPPP completed Phase II by undertaking several activities to support the implementation of the National Action Plan.

Phase II Completed Activities:

  • Local Implementation Committee established and housed at PLACON plus a local Implementation Coordinator hired with IPPP funding.
  • Disseminated the National Action Plan.
  • Contributed to the reconciliation movement in Guinea-Bissau by collaborating on the ECOWAS/CPLP/UNOGBIS-sponsored Reconciliation process.
  • Supported a mission by Search for Common Ground to asses the possibility of starting new programming in Guinea-Bissau.
  • Funds donated to support a youth workshop.
  • Supported the development of a Defense Strategy Paper.
  • Continued to build and support an informal network of Friends of Guinea-Bissau.
  • Hired a Consultant from Intermediate Technology Consultants to assess the Feasibility of Small Business Incubators.
  • Presented at an UNDP-Sponsored Conference on Early Warning Systems Held in Khartoum, Sudan. To read the conference report click Here.
  • Presented at an Event Entitled 'Catalytic Processes for Integrated Country Peacebuilding Strategies: What Are They Accomplishing?' Hosted by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. To read the event summary click Here.

PHASE III

We are currently in Phase III, which will involve the completion and continuation of some activities from earlier phases, including continued lobbying and awareness raising, continued development of lessons learned, and continued technical support for the implementation of some activities from the National Action Plan .

Additionally, Phase III will include new activities such as undertaking political mediation, making a larger contribution to the reconciliation movement within Guinea-Bissau, new support for ongoing and planned SSR/DDR activities, and an increased focus on economic activities.

Phase III Completed Activities:

  • IPPP is presented at the UN. To read the press release click Here.
  • IPPP attended a Roundtable Donors Conference in Geneva. To read the IPPP report on the conference click Here.
  • An IPPP-supported workshop to identify issues and solutions related to bolstering cashew production and sales was held on December 11-12, 2006. A workshop report will be forthcoming.
  • The IPPP supported a new regularly-occurring Trade Fair that brings together producers, processors, and consumers to promote local products.
  • The IPPP provided funding support to the Military Reconciliation Commission so they could extend their activities beyond the capital.
  • The IPPP supported a new project developed by the Chamber of Agriculture, Commerce, and Industry which will help small, medium, and large businesses to improve their performance via several activities (e.g. legal assistance, training, and consulting).
  • On March 8-10, 2007 the IPPP in collaboration with Search for Common Ground designed and facilitated a three day workshop with over 20 journalists on the topic of 'Reporting in Conflict Settings'. Workshop participants were introduced to a variety of tools for conflict analysis and neutral reporting.
  • On March 15-16, 2007 the IPPP designed and facilitated a two day informal dialogue on national reconciliation which was convened by ECOWAS
  • The IPPP provided financial assistance to the Chamber of Commerce for the development of a Labor Roster in order to list, promote, and develop a local labor force.
  • On June 8-9 the IPPP and ECOWAS convened a two day dialogue to discuss the proposed terms of reference of the New National Commission on Reconciliation.
  • The IPPP commissioned Reseau Liberte, a Canadian organization specializing in the development of an independent press in new democracies, to deliver a training workshop on investigative journalism in Bissau from 13-17 November, 2007. To read more about this event in their newsletter click Here.
  • In February, 2008 the IPPP granted funds to the Union of Journalists and Technicians of Social Communication (SINJOTECS) to hold a one-day media conference. This conference serves as a follow-up to the session held in November, 2007.

National Action Planning Session
"Opening Ceremonies for The National Action Planning Session (February 2006)"


Using the Conflict TreeSmall Working Groups DialogueSmall Groups Undertake Analysis                    
"Local Facilitators Lead Small Group Sessions to Design the National Action Plan for Guinea-Bissau (February 2006)"



Closing Session
"The National Action Plan for Guinea-Bissau is Presented to the Group  (February 2006)"


Instability in Guinea-Bissau

The Conflict Analysis undertaken in the National Action Planning Session identified 8 key issues for Guinea-Bissau:

1. Lack of Trade Culture
2. Lack of Education/Professional training
3. Lack of Political Tools to Solve Ethnic, Religious and Military Issues
4. Lack of a National Image
5. Lack of Good Administration
6. Army
7. Economic Stagnation
8. Lack of Justice

The 8 key problems are manifest through several cross-cutting impacts. Some examples of the main consequences identified include:

  • Political Instability 
  • Corruption 
  • Lack of a National Image  
  • Rise of HIV 
  • Unemployment 
  • Extreme Poverty 
  • Strikes and Late Payment of Salaries 
  • Criminality 
  • Lack of Development 
  • Permanent Conflicts 
  • Permanent Political Crisis 
  • Lack of Democracy 
  • Violence 
  • Lack of Good Political Will

Furthermore, 8 main causes were identified by the analysis; the main causes are listed below and are related to the main problems and consequences listed above:

1. Crisis in State Affirmation
2. Lack of qualified human resources
3. Inadequacy and lack of clear goals in the educational and profession training systems
4. Mistrust in win-win dialogue
5. Manipulation of national security and defense force for political means
6. Lack of favorable climate for business and investment
7. Increase of non-conciliatory interest groups
8. Struggle for power


 
Support the Project

You can directly help the IPPP in Guinea-Bissau in several ways:

  • Donate funds to the IPPP's small-grant program (funds given to support small projects in Guinea-Bissau from $250 - $10,000).
  • Though partial funding has been provided by a private donor, CIIAN is seeking additional funding to help carry out the full range of interventions needed to prevent the eruption of deadly violence in Guinea-Bissau. Therefore, we are seeking corporate sponsors to support our work in Guinea-Bissau.
  • Help make others aware of the situation in Guinea-Bissau and the IPPP's work by sharing the link to our website and/or the project documents.


Key Background Documents and Related Research:

Conflict Early Warning System for Sudan (February, 2007)

MISSION STILL POSSIBLE: Three Keys to Peace and Prosperity in Guinea-Bissau (January, 2007)

PREVENTING POLITICAL VIOLENCE: Towards a Model for Catalytic Action (August, 2006)

A Few Donors Keep Hope Alive for Guinea-Bissau

A Feasibility Study into the Establishment of a Small Business Incubator in Guinea-Bissau

Short Summary of the IPPP's Approach & Activities

Mid-term Evaluation of the International Peace and Prosperity Project's Work in Guinea-Bissau (October 2004 - February 2006) by Paz Buttedahl, Ph.D. and Rosemary Cairns, M.A. Royal Roads University

National Action Plan for Peace and Prosperity in Guinea-Bissau

Plan d'Action Nationale pour la Paix et la Prospérité en Guinée-Bissau

News Article about the February 2006 National Action Planning Session

Guinea-Bissau: "Failed State" Looking to Recover (Update & Prospective from the IPPP)

Reconciliation and Renewal in Guinea-Bissau

MISSION POSSIBLE: A Ripe Opportunity to Avert Violent Conflict And Achieve Sustainable Peace in Guinea-Bissau

A National Plan for Peace and Prosperity in Guinea-Bissau: Concept Paper

Romeo Dallaire and Rwanda Are Household Names in Canada: An Op Ed Piece

Peace Guerilla (MPG Movie) - A short movie about the IPPP.


TRIP REPORTS:
June 2005 Trip Report
October 2004 Trip Report

Return to Top



The Dialogues Project: Bridging People and Identities

mostar bridge

silvia

Project Overview

The project is lead by the Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation (CIIAN), in collaboration with the Canadian Institute for Conflict Resolution (CICR), Modern Times Stage Company, Production Jeux d'ombres, and OKC Abrasević.

“The Dialogues Project” is a unique combination of theatre, conflict resolution mediation, documentary production and research. The focal point of the project is the production of the play “Aurash”. “Aurash” a contemporary play by celebrated Iranian playwright, historian and filmmaker, Bahram Beyza'i, is based on a 1000 year-old Persian myth about a heroic archer, Aurash, whose skills rescues Persia from destruction. For centuries, the myth remained a seminal story of nationalism and pride for the Persian people. In the 1970s, Beyza'i revamped the fable, taking an ironical look at its nationalism, and infusing it with strong humanist and pacifist themes.In conjunction with Mostar partner OKC Abrasević, the play will be cast with local citizens, professionals and non-professionals from various ethnic backgrounds, ages, and genders. Performances will be held in the city of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina in the spring of 2008.

Rationale

Social groups within Mostar are still divided, fighting a war without bullets. The city is now one of the key areas where success or failure of long-term stability in the region will be determined. Monitoring the long-term application of the peace process is vital to overall security and reconstruction efforts. Peace building is not merely the absence of violence—it is the presence of durable formal and informal conflict mediation and resolution mechanisms. The formal state structures such as the legal system are being strengthened, but the informal networks of volunteers, family and neighbourhoods are being neglected. Without support for these groups, a vibrant civil society, a democratic and accountable government, and formal education and health sectors remains impossible.

Vlatko
The Dialogues Project focuses on these informal segments of society—it is rooted in the notion that reconciliation and peace is obtained through dialogue, and dialogue is at the core of theatre. Through careful selection of local actors from an array of ethnic and religious backgrounds, representing both genders and various age groups, Aurash provides the actors and the audience the opportunity to explore how identity and conflict interact. It affords them an opportunity to ponder how their own perception of identity impacts their daily lives. The presence of professional conflict mediators will facilitate constructive communications between all parties.

The Dialogues Project Video (WMV Movie) - A short movie on the development of the project.
 

Research Papers 

For academics with proposals for research, please contact 'The Dialogues Project' Research Coordinator Roger Hill by way of project coordinator Renée Gendron.

Identity is a fundamental component to many conflicts. Identity can be manipulated to mobilize and militarize populations and push them towards conflict. When used negatively, identity serves to demarcate groups, heightening differences while downplaying similarities, common struggles, and shared achievements.

The cast of actors will be selected from the local population. They will be selected for their acting abilities and will represent the ethnic composition of the city of Mostar.  

Leading academics from the fields of conflict resolution and conflict mediation will be selected to participate. The research will focus on how the actors interact with one another and how stereotypes (both negative and positive) influence Maja1a person's perception of the 'other'. Moreover, the research will assess the degree of ethnic and social cleavage in present day Mostar and how these social divides impact the overall peace  process. From these observations, policy makers, analysts, mediators, civil servants, researchers, and members of the public will be able to better ascertain the current obstacles for peacemaking in the city and country.

flashpoints

The Documentary

A documentary film is to be made on the theatre rehearsals and production that promises to disseminate the results of the project to the general public and institutions of research, as well as provide pertinent interview material for researchers. A feature-length documentary will be made as well as hour-long versions for Canadian and European markets. Furthermore, a series of shorter educational videos will be created for specific pedagogical purposes.

About Aurash

In the original myth “Aurash”, the hero releases an arrow that travels three days and nights to land in a far away walnut tree, thus defining a vast new land of Persia. In Bahram Beyza'i's version, Aurash, a native of and humble stable hand, becomes an unwilling player in his country's post-war border treaty, with very different results.

The story is set in Persia, in a time when the country is on the brink of annihilation. The conquering country lays down the terms of surrender: an arrow must be released from Persia's highest mountain peak and wherever it lands, the new borders will be drawn. At a loss to find a willing saviour for his country, the Persian Commander decides to send an envoy to plead for more time. Aurash, a humble stable hand, is selected, as he is the only one who speaks the enemy's language.

Aurash travels to meet the conquering King of Turan. The wry and cruel king grants a reprieve, but with one small condition... Aurash must be the archer. Returning to Persia, Aurash finds the news of the arrangements has preceded him. The country's wrath falls on Aurash: he is beaten, and his name is cursed on every tongue.

Aurash laments his fate, but in the end decides to fulfill his role as the national “hero”. He begins his difficult and lonely ascent up Mount Elborz. His struggle is as much philosophical as it is physical: he seeks answers from his father's ghost, his shadow and Mount Elborz herself. But he finds himself neither solace, nor companionship on his path, and he arrives at the summit accompanied only by a raging heart. Summoning all his soul, he releases the arrow to the heavens.

The arrow sails away... never to land.

To this day it is said that Persians remain at the foot of the Elborz waiting for the arrow to fall to earth, and for their hero to return.

The City of Mostar Stari Most

The city of Mostar was the principal Turkish administrative centre of the Herzegovina region during the sixteenth century. Mostar is on the Neretva River. Mostar derives its name from the stone bridge, the Stari Most, that spans its banks. It was transferred to Austria in 1878 and then Yugoslavia after the Second World War. Mostar was a significant commercial centre in Bosnia-Herzegovina. It produced tobacco, aluminium, bauxite and wine. There is also a hydroelectric plant nearby. 

During the Bosnian War, Mostar was under siege for eighteen months. The army of Bosnia-Herzegovina allied with the Croatian Defence Council. Together they successfully repelled the Yugoslav's People's Army attacks. Once the siege had lifted, the city was divided into two camps. West Mostar, was run by the Army of the Republic of Croatia, and East Mostar was run by the Bosnian government. The bridge built in 1566 by the Ottomans, was destroyed in 1993. The destruction of a historical landmark not only divided the city in two, it left deep social wounds.

Maja2 The 1995 Dayton Accords brought the conflict to an end. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe initiated a mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina with specific emphasis on the rule of law, good governance and the protection of human rights.

The situation in Mostar to this day remains strained. The destruction of the bridge visualized the deep social chasms of the city. Although the bridge has since been rebuilt, the trust between the various communities in Mostar remains damaged.

Project Objectives

  • Produce a beautiful play for the residents of Mostar  (4 performances)
  • Produce a documentary that explores the experience of creating and producing the play, looking at the role of identity and ideology in present day Bosnia and Herzegovina.Goran
  • Provide mediation for the actors
  • Provide lessons learned from project and assess the current stressors to peacebuilding efforts. Publish results of findings.
  • Create educational videos for Canadian and European audiences




Project Participants

Soheil Parsa is an award-winning Iranian-Canadian theatre director. In 1995, Soheil received the New Pioneers Award by Skills for Change for Outstanding Contribution to the Arts by a recent immigrant to Canada. He has received four Dora Mavor Moore awards as well as a Chalmers Fellowship. Soheil is the co-founder of the Modern Times Stage Company (based in Toronto), known for its daring, highly imagistic productions of international themes. Soheil will be the director of the play.

Vesna Dasović-Marković will serve as mediation specialist during the project. Vesna received her law degree from the University of Belgrade. She was a judge in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Her knowledge of the criminal justice system provided Vesna with unique qualities that enabled her to train over 300 hundred judges in mediation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro and Macedonia. She is an Honoured Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Conflict Resolution (CICR). Among her many accomplishments, Vesna was the country director and lead trainer and mediator providing Third Party Neutral (TPN) courses in a community-based conflict resolution project coordinated by the CICR. Vesna is a member of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (OMMP) and the Association of Mediators in Bosnia and Herzegovina. She has mediated and co-mediated in over 200 cases. She has prepared the Evaluation Report on the “Introduction of Mediation in Banja Luka Basic Course Pilot Project.

Peter Farbridge will direct the documentary. He collaborates with the film production house Productions Jeux d’ombres, and has directed two documentary films, “Change From Within” and “Not an Extra”. Peter has a diverse background in theatre production, acting, directing and writing.

Dr.Ben Hoffman is contributing his expertise in conflict resolution to the project. He is Director of the International Peace and Prosperity Project (IPPP). Ben was recently a Visiting Scholar at the University of Victoria. He directed the Conflict Resolution Program at the Carter Center in Atlanta, Georgia. He is President and was a co-founder of the Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation. He received his Masters in Psychology from Wilfred Laurier University and a second Masters in International Relations from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, a Specialization in International Peacekeeping from Harvard and a PhD from York University, Great Britain.

Brian Strom is contributing his expertise in conflict resolution to the project. He is the Executive Director of the Canadian Institute for Conflict Resolution. He worked for 23 years at the Farm Credit Corporation. The last eight years of his time at the Farm Credit Corporation, Brian was Senior Vice-President. Brian has been involved in the field of conflict resolution for the past 12 years, in the private as well as public sector. He is a member of the Civilian Peace Service Working Group.

Roger Hill is a Senior Associate of the Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation (CIIAN), Roger Hill is an international affairs specialist now focusing on conflict resolution and peacebuilding. With extensive experience in multilateral diplomacy, advice to parliament, university teaching and research, he has served as Political Advisor with a major international organization, Deputy Director of a group advising parliamentary committees, and Research Director of a government peace and security institute. He has served as advisor to Canadian delegations at more than thirty international conferences. Affiliated with CIIAN over the last decade, he has carried out a multi-year study on the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and other conflict resolution techniques in  the world’s conflict situations, as well as work on Cyprus, Balkan issues, and Indian Land Claims in Canada.


Contact Information

LEAD ORGANIZATION

              Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation  (President: Dr. Ben Hoffman)

            
PARTNERS

            Canadian Institute of Conflict Resolution (CICR) (Executive Director Brian Strom)

            Modern Times Stage Company (Coordinator: Sue Balint)

            Productions Jeux d’ombres (Documentary Producer: Anne-Marie Gélinas)

            OKC Abrasević (Media Coordinator: Husein Orucevi)

For all information concerning The Dialogues Project please contact the Project Coordinator: Renée Gendron

Return to Top



Global Warning & Response Network 

CIIAN's International Peace and Prosperity Project (IPPP) in Guinea-Bissau is serving as a model for the development of a new Global Warning and Response Network.

The objective of Global WARN is twofold: 

First, to develop a state of the art website that pools early warning information from various open sources (e.g. NGOs, academic institutions, and independent researchers) to collectively become the platform on early warning and prevention of violent conflict.

Second, Global WARN will bridge the warning-response gap by providing a mechanism for the development of timely response options. To this end, multiple actors inside and outside the affected countries will be mobilized and supported in undertaking early response actions. 

The focus of Global WARN is on networking and facilitation of existing resources instead of external interventions form northern organizations. We aim at striking strategic partnerships between northern and southern organizations whereby the latter take the lead, with northern partners providing the necessary support. SwissPeace is facilitating these processes and acts as secretariat to the Global WARN board.

Global WARN is set-up as a three year pilot project confined at this stage to West Africa. The main local partner is the West African Network for Peacebuilding (WANEP) and among the many northern organizations involved in the project are the Canadian International Institute of Applied Negotiation (CIIAN), the Alliance for Peacebuilding (AfP), International Crisis Group, International Alert, Responding to Conflict (RTC), Conciliation Resources and the Center for Security Studies at the University of Zurich.

Support the Project

  • CIIAN is seeking funding to support the full implementation of this important project. Please contact us for more information.
Return to Top



The Peace Guerilla Handbook

This Handbook is for anyone charged with the task of preventing political violence or with building peace. The Handbook puts flesh on the bones of commonly recited 'best practices' for peacebuilding: that action be theory informed, holistic, comprehensive, collaborative, facilitative, and sustained. It goes further, calling upon the peacebuilder to apply unconventional methodologies in an ever-vigilant effort to remove violence and to build the conditions in society that will make positive peace sustainable.

Cost: $10.00 Cdn. + $2 Shipping and Handling ($3.50 for U.S. customers and $4.50 for international orders). Orders of 2 or more books are invoiced on a per cost basis. Email us to order a copy.

Return to Top



Violence Prevention Blog

We are currently seeking authors to volunteer to write short articles or provide editorial feedback for the violence prevention blog. To read the current articles, please visit the blog at: http://iarpv.blogspirit.com

Return to Top



Bridge the Knowledge-Action Gap! The Authoritative Statement on How to Reduce Political Violence

This study of activities in conflict prevention, mediation and post-violence peacebuilding is now available.

Cost: $10.00 Cdn. + $5 Shipping and Handling

Email us to order a copy

OR

Click to download... (660 KB)

Return to Top



Terrorism: Does Conflict Resolution Have a Role?

Should efforts be made to talk to terrorists?  This important question has been largely overlooked by governments, militaries and members of the peace and conflict resolution communities.

The dominant working assumption today is that terrorists are irrational; indeed, that they no longer wish to come to the table to discuss their demands, they "want to destroy the table itself".  Increased security measures, enforcement, and hostile engagement to neutralize them follows.

CIIAN is generating research and dialogue on the following questions:


The definition of terrorist

Insurgents, freedom fighters, rebels, terrorists. What is the internationally adopted working definition of terrorist? What has changed in the definition? What are the implications for current policy and practice? What corrections should be made?


What drives contemporary terrorists?

Are the motives of today's terrorists always negative? Are their actions rational in any sense? Does their cause ever have legitimacy?

Lessons from History

What does past experience with known terrorist groups offer today (e.g. IRA, FLQ, Biner-Minhoff Group)? 

How can terrorists be dealt with more effectively?

Are terrorists beyond engagement through dialogue? Can soft and hard power be combined effectively? Is there a role for conflict resolution practitioners?


Key Background Documents and Related Research

A Summary of Key Articles



Return to Top